We store cookies on your device to make sure we give you the best experience on this website. I'm fine with this - Turn cookies off
Switch to an accessible version of this website which is easier to read. (requires cookies)

Leaving the EU poses “very significant risks” to UK’s future

April 27, 2014 12:01 AM
Originally published by UK Liberal Democrats

Two new reports commissioned by independent financial services membership body, TheCityUK show that leaving the European Union poses significant risks to Britain's future. This latest research suggests that exiting the EU would undermine Britain's economic well-being and the ability of business to grow and compete in world markets.

The reports also found that the EU has a positive impact on driving UK trade, high productivity and growth.


The two reports entitled A Legal Assessment of the UK's relationship with the EU - a financial services perspective, and Analysing the case for EU membership - How does the economic evidence stack up? determine that all alternatives to EU membership considered in the research would be costly to British businesses. The reports suggest exiting the EU risks damage to Britain through uncertainty and loss of influence.

The reports conclude that Britain's continued membership of the EU is in the UK's best long term interests.

The legal research commissioned from global law firm Clifford Chance has reviewed in depth the legal implications of eight different EU relationship scenarios - three where the UK remains a member and five alternatives to membership - and their impact on financial services.

Key findings of the report make it clear the UK is better in than out:

  • Exit scenarios from Europe risk damage to UK financial services through uncertainty, reduced market access and loss of influence. Attempts to carve out exemptions for the UK could lead to carve outs in other areas by other member states, fragmenting the Internal Market.
  • Access to the EU's Internal Market in financial services for non EU-member states would not be guaranteed if the UK became a member of the European Economic Area and the European Free Trade Association (EAA- EFTA). In order to obtain Internal Market access, the UK would have to implement all of the relevant EU legislation, having given up its say in formulating it.
  • Key aspects of EU financial services law are already modelled on the UK regime, including MiFID and the Market Abuse Directive. This benefits the City which functions as the global marketplace for EU and international firms. The UK is successful more often than not in getting what it wants in EU financial services regulation.
  • The UK can sustain its influence on the development of Internal Market legislation better as an EU member, allowing it to preserve market access, promote liberal economic policies and have maximum influence in setting market rules.
  • The UK should make a strong case for reform, promoting both harmonisation and mutual recognition - making the Internal Market effective for both Euro area and non-Euro area members.
  • With the advent of Banking Union, the UK needs to play an active role working from within the EU to ensure the integrity and coherence of the EU-wide Internal Market.
  • Through EU membership and in its own right, the UK benefits from double representation on international forums such as the WTO and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
  • Overall, the European and global interests of UK financial services are best served by the UK remaining a member of the EU. Current membership gives access to the most powerful tools to promote our interests, including voting, veto rights, opt-outs, free movement, justice and home affairs.

Chris Cummings, Chief Executive of TheCityUK, added: "Current EU membership not only gives the UK access to the most powerful tools to promote its interests including voting and veto rights, but it is also significantly tailored to meet UK- specific objectives. By contrast, this research clearly shows that leaving the EU would pose a number of risks. Uncertainty about what a "no" vote in any referendum would entail is one of the most significant."

The economic report sets out how economies foster growth and create jobs. The report considers productivity, trade, supply chains, multinationals and immigration.

Key findings include:

  • EU membership is vital for UK growth. In particular, EU membership benefits the UK's most productive firms - those that export.
  • The Single Market, due to its size and geographical proximity, plays a fundamental role in driving UK innovation and productivity; size of market and levels of competition matter.
  • As trade is costly, exporters prioritise large, geographically close markets with strong institutions and sophisticated financial markets, making the EU their ideal partner.
  • They benefit from the EU as the world's largest market, accounting for 25% of global GDP, 45% of UK exports and 50% of imports. Over 80% of UK firms that trade do business with Europe. Further, EU trade deals with third countries mean that around 60% of UK trade is with countries that come under the umbrella of trade agreements. This will rise to 85% if current EU trade negotiations are successful.
  • All EU exit options would increase trade costs for high productivity firms - leading to falling output, increased costs, as well as reduced investment. The knock on impact of Brexit would be higher prices and higher unemployment, with lower real wages and growth.

Malcolm Sweeting, Senior Partner of Clifford Chance said: "The success of the UK financial services industry is to a large extent built on EU Internal Market legislation. To abandon this for some untried, unknown and unpredictable alternative would carry very significant risks. The UK is a powerful player in the EU and should retain the capacity to push for reform as a member."

Gerry Grimstone, Chairman of TheCityUK, said: "Our research clearly shows that leaving the EU would seriously damage economic growth and jobs in the UK. But the EU can and must be improved. It mustn't interfere in things which it does not need to do and it must make a better job of doing the things it has to do. We need to continue saying this loudly and clearly. London is Europe's financial centre so there is a strong national interest in getting this right."